As Berger and Luckmann picturesquely illustrate in their book The Social Construction of Reality (1966), culture can be understood as the interpretation and its manifestations of a perceived reality. Interpretation refers to micro-level knowledge about realities; manifestations refer to prevailing macro-level structures like values, norms or institutions. One example for an institution could be a planning department or the planning system itself with its laws and spatial priorities. Culture and Society is dialectical in the way that institutions shape, reproduce or alter society and behaviour. Yet institutions are also a product of culture and society, as described by James S. Coleman 1986 or Anthony Giddens (1984: The Constitution of Society).

Hence, the planning system shapes reality and culture through the transformation of the built environment and obeys to culture at the same time. In such a way, it could be argued that the planning system is contested, in theā€¦

View original post 148 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s